
A 'museum quality replica' of the so-called 'Jonah Ossuary' from the "Jesus Discovery" website: http://thejesusdiscovery.org/intro/img_7422/
I just mention all of this briefly, not desiring to waste much time blogging on it. Simply follow Robert Cargill’s blog for short, funny updates on how wrong the new book and upcoming TV special are. The latest: Cargill now agrees with Antonio Lambatti that the image on the ossuary is a type of pottery called an amphora. Also, Cargill suggests now we call it the Tilapia Tomb (get it? Talpiot Tomb and supposedly — not really — there is a fish on an ossuary). Follow Dr. Cargill here: http://robertcargill.com/
By the way, the confusion about what the amphora image (the thing they are calling a fish) actually was resulted from the fact that they released at first only limited images which could not be placed in context. Now that they have released more photos, it is clearer what the not-so-fishy image really is and that their fish story is what is really fishy.
Derek,
This thing about the tomb really bothers me. Some people is getting into this trap, some Tabor’s claims is that Jesus was married and a son. They want to portrait Jesus as a mere man, without his attributes. I think is sad that some people really believe this kind of stuff. It is very deceptive to claim something it is not.
What is the difference between this discovery and the Talpiot Tomb? Is not the same hoax? I am sorry that Tabor is involved in this kind of stuff, you can expect that from Simcha Jacobovici and James Cameron, but about Tabor? He isn’t the most orthodox guy, but he is putting all this credibility in doubt.